Review: The Rose and the Thorn
"Beauty and the Beast" is a fairy tale that princess fans never get tired of. Its gothic setting, intrigue, and romance are staples of any good princess story. The most famous novel adaptation is Beauty by Robin McKinley, but there are plenty of others that are just as good. I was fortunate enough to stumble upon a more recent retelling on Twitter called The Rose and the Thorn by Katherine Macdonald. This book shares some common threads with Enchantment by Camille Peters, another "Beauty and the Beast" adaptation I read recently, but unlike that version, it does not overlook the main theme of seeing beyond physical appearances. The "Beast" character in this book is cursed to appear to the world as a monster just like the one in the fairy tale and even picks up some of the violent tendencies of his beastly outer shell once a month, similar to werewolf mythology. However, the book has very little violence overall. Like most "Beauty and the Beast" adaptations, The Rose and the Thorn is a patient romance set in a mysterious enchanted castle.
Romance is the most important aspect of any "Beauty and the Beast" retelling, and this book excels in that respect as well. During her time in the castle, Rose convinces Thorn to open up about himself little by little. She is extraordinarily patient with him and never judges his appearance or insecurities. After his experience with other girls who stayed in the castle, Thorn knows that Rose is special. He assumes she would be scared of him at first and is surprised when she isn't. They have many cute moments together, including several that resemble the Disney film. He grows so close with her that he worries he is being selfish by keeping her to himself, so he shows her his magic mirrors to let her see her family. During the book's thrilling climax, Thorn and Rose must prove their love to the powerful wicked fairy who placed the curse on him and his castle.
Overall, The Rose and the Thorn is a traditional retelling of "Beauty and the Beast" with some well-written new elements. I loved Rose's family and the backstory with the two fairies that caused the curse on Thorn and his castle. The book had a few minor typos throughout, but I didn't find them too distracting. Rose and Thorn were terrific archetypes for the "Beauty" and "Beast" characters. The less important characters in the story were fleshed out and full of personality as well. It was a relaxing and patient book that only picked up the pace when it was necessary. If you are a fan of alternate versions of "Beauty and the Beast," you will love this book.
Comments
Both of them have written versions of the story. You can read the Perrault one at http://johnsonclasswebsite.weebly.com/uploads/5/6/3/4/56345927/beauty_and_the_beast.pdf and the Beaumont one at https://www.pitt.edu/~dash/beauty.html. They are sightly different. The original version was actually written by neither of them, but in fact, Gabrielle-Suzanne Barbot de Villeneuve. However, the other two versions are more famous. You can read more about the fairy tale at http://www.theprincessblog.org/2017/08/the-legacy-of-beauty-and-beast.html. Have a lovely day!